Creased from three to 12 , Icosabutate MedChemExpress indicating that the when the moisture Guretolimod Autophagy content of
Creased from three to 12 , indicating that the when the moisture content of sorghum fiber increased from 3 to 12 , indicating that the fiber moisture content had small effect around the heat transfer of OFPC. Moreover, as opposed to fiber moisture content material had little impact on the heat transfer of OFPC. Additionally, in contrast to within a classic natural fiber-based mat with liquid thermosetting resin, the HDPE films inside the mat acted like barriers for water vapor flowing through the mat thickness. As a result, it was affordable to exclude the heat convection of vapor in the heat transfer model from the OFPC. 3.four. Effects of Mat Density on Heat Transfer Figure 5 shows the effects of mat density around the mat core temperature for the duration of OFPC Figure 4. Effect of moisture content material on heat transfer of OFPC during hot-pressing (the mat target hot-pressing. The mat core temperature was greater at a higher mat density in each the density was 0.9 g/cm3 plus the HDPE content was ten ). experimental test (Figure 5a) and the mathematic model (Figure 5b). A close examination of Equation (8) shows that the thermal conductivity in the mat linearly increases with density, The temperature conductivity the one-quarter efficiency not obviously modify along with a greater thermalat the core andresults in higherposition didof thermal conduction, when the moisture content ofresults that indicate an increase into 12 , indicating that with supporting the experimental sorghum fiber improved from three the core temperature the fiber moisture content had small influence around the heat transfer of OFPC. Furthermore, unlike3.four. Effects of Mat Density on Heat Transfer Figure five shows the effects of mat density around the mat core temperature during OFPC hot-pressing. The mat core temperature was higher at a larger mat density in each the experimental test (Figure 5a) along with the mathematic model (Figure 5b). A close examination of Equation (8) shows that the thermal conductivity of the mat linearly increases with 14 9 of density, along with a higher thermal conductivity results in larger efficiency of thermal conduction, supporting the experimental results that indicate an increase within the core temperature with increasing mat density. The mat contained more sorghum fiber and HDPE content increasing mat density. The mat contained much more sorghum fiber and HDPE content per per unit volume at a greater density. These materials, which includes far more molecules in the mat, unit volume at energy todensity. These supplies, such as more inverse effect around the absorbed much more a higher raise their internal power. This had an molecules within the mat, absorbed far more power to boost their internal power. This had inverse influence of mat temperature raise from the mat, and Equation (2) also supports the an inverse effect on the temperature increase in the mat, and Equation (2) also supports the inversespecific heat density. The temperature raise as a result of power absorption will depend on the effect of mat density. The temperature raise because of energy absorption is dependent upon the distinct of capacity. The mat core temperature enhanced with density below the combined effects heat capacity. heat mat coreefficiency andincreased with density under the combined effects of a a greater The transfer temperature larger heat absorption at a greater mat density. greater heat transfer efficiency and higher heat absorption at a higher mat density.Polymers 2021, 13,Polymers 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW10 ofFigure five. five. Effects of mat density on the mat core temperature in the course of.
