The volume of one hundred causes the concrete mix to condense and cut down its air content material. The compression strength of concrete samples with sandgravel and sand asalt mixtures of aggregates produced with all the tested additive is higher than that obtained for the handle samples. The use of fly ash inside the array of one hundred causes a slight enhance in the water absorption of concrete samples created with both sand ravel and sand asalt mixes of aggregates. The addition of waste ashes increases the depth of water penetration of the samples of all tested concrete series. The addition of fly ash from biomass to concretes in amounts as much as 30 reduces the lower in compression strength of these concretes just after low-temperature resistance tests and will not cause the formation of fragments, cracks and defects in the sample. Also, concrete composites containing the addition of ash from biomass combustion, taking into account the crack of your composite along with the penetration of water,2.three.4.five.Components 2021, 14,13 of6.don’t show a adverse influence around the natural atmosphere associated with the leaching (release) of heavy metals in to the environment. The use of waste ash features a constructive effect on the all-natural atmosphere by lowering the demand for organic resources. The use of fly ash within the volume of 30 with the cement mass as a sand substitute, depending on the kind of aggregate mixture, reduces sand usage by 11520 kg/m3 , i.e., by about 150 .Author Contributions: VBIT-4 web Investigation, application, methodology, writing original draft preparation, J.J.; conceptualization, methodology, analysis, writing overview and editing, M.U. All authors have study and agreed towards the published version of your manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Institutional Review Board Bomedemstat Biological Activity Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: The data presented within this study are readily available on request in the corresponding author. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank GDF SUEZ Polaniec for producing waste components available for research. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the style with the study; within the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; inside the writing of the manuscript; or within the selection to publish the results.
materialsArticleCherenkov Radiation Detection on a LS Counter for 226Ra Determination in Water and Its Comparison with Other Typical MethodsIvana Stojkovi1 , Natasa Todorovi2,three, , Jovana Nikolov two , Branka Radulovi2 and Michele Guida 3,four c c cFaculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovia six, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; c [email protected] Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovia three, c 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] (J.N.); [email protected] (B.R.) Division of Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics (DIEM), University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; [email protected] Institute of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, 1658 Riga, Latvia Correspondence: [email protected]: Stojkovi, I.; Todorovi, N.; c c Nikolov, J.; Radulovi, B.; Guida, M. c Cherenkov Radiation Detection on a LS Counter for 226 Ra Determination in Water and Its Comparison with Other Popular Solutions. Supplies 2021, 14, 6719. https://doi.org/ ten.3390/ma14216719 Academic Editors: Salvatore Tudis.
